Home / Search / Contesting Femicide: Feminism and the Power of Law Revisited
Cover of Contesting Femicide: Feminism and the Power of Law Revisited
ISBN-13 · 9780367665715ISBN-10 · 0367665719Publisher · RoutledgeFormat · Paperback, 150 pagesPublished · 2020Language · English

Contesting Femicide: Feminism and the Power of Law Revisited

Rent this book

Free return shipping included
Total rental price$33.30

Please Note: Rental books are typically used and do not come with any unused access code cards.

Return by 2026-10-26. Prepaid return label included; extend at any point for the difference in price.

Buy from a seller

Bookface-OutletShips from CA
GoodTypical used book with minor wear and signs of use. May have some highlighting or writing.
90.11

About this book

Focusing on femicide, this book provides a contemporary re-evaluation of Carol Smart's innovative approach to the law question as first outlined in her ground-breaking book, Feminism and the Power of Law (Routledge 1989). Smart advocated turning to the legal domain not so much for demanding law reforms as construing it as a site on which to contest gender and more particularly, gendered constructions of women's experiences. Over the last 30 to 40 years, feminist law scholars and activists have launched scathing trans-jurisdictional critiques of the operation of provocation defences in hundreds of femicide cases. The evidence unearthed by feminist scholars that these defences operate in profoundly sexed ways is unequivocal. Accordingly, femicide cases have become critically important sites for feminist engagement and intervention across numerous jurisdictions. Exploring an area of criminal law that was not one of Smart's own focal concerns, this book both honours and extends Smart's work by approaching femicide as a site of engagement and counter-discourse that calls into question hegemonic representations of gendered relationships. Femicide cases thus provide a way to continue the endlessly valuable discursive work Smart advocated and practised in other fields of law: both in articulating alternative accounts of gendered relationships and in challenging law's power to disqualify women's experiences of violence while privileging men's feelings and rights.