Home / Search / Arius Didymus on Peripatetic Ethics, Household Management, and Politics: Text, Translation, and Discussion
Cover of Arius Didymus on Peripatetic Ethics, Household Management, and Politics: Text, Translation, and Discussion
ISBN-13 · 9780367594589ISBN-10 · 0367594587Publisher · RoutledgeFormat · Paperback, 360 pagesPublished · 2020Language · English

Arius Didymus on Peripatetic Ethics, Household Management, and Politics: Text, Translation, and Discussion

Rent this book

Free return shipping included
Total rental price$32.80

Please Note: Rental books are typically used and do not come with any unused access code cards.

Return by 2026-10-25. Prepaid return label included; extend at any point for the difference in price.

Buy from a seller

Bookface-OutletShips from CA
GoodTypical used book with minor wear and signs of use. May have some highlighting or writing.
88.77

About this book

This volume features a unique epitome (original summation) of Aristotelian practical philosophy. It is often attributed to Arius Didymus who composed a survey of Peripatetic thought on three closely related areas: ethics, household management, and politics. The quality of the epitome, which draws not only on the surviving treatises of Aristotle, but also on works by later Peripatetics, is excellent.

In recent years the epitome has attracted increased attention as an important document for the understanding of Hellenistic philosophy. This new edition of the Greek text is much needed; the most recent edition dates from 1884 and is seriously faulty. This translation, provided by Georgia Tsouni, is based on the oldest and best manuscripts and takes account of recent discussions of difficult passages. In addition, an English translation appears opposite the Greek text on facing pages. The text-translation is followed by nine essays, which are written for a wide audience--not only philosophers and classicists, but also scholars interested in politics and social order.

The essays also consider issues of a more philological nature: Who in fact was the author of the epitome? Is Theophrastus an important source? In discussing political matters, is the author intending to defend the practice of philosophy in Augustan Rome? Was there a second epitome, perhaps with a different slant, that has been lost?