Home / Search / Why It's Ok to Eat Meat
Cover of Why It's Ok to Eat Meat
ISBN-13 · 9780367172756ISBN-10 · 0367172755Publisher · RoutledgeFormat · Hardcover, 220 pagesPublished · 2021Language · English

Why It's Ok to Eat Meat

Rent this book

Free return shipping included
Total rental price$127.80

Please Note: Rental books are typically used and do not come with any unused access code cards.

Return by 2026-10-26. Prepaid return label included; extend at any point for the difference in price.

Buy from a seller

Bookface-OutletShips from CA
GoodTypical used book with minor wear and signs of use. May have some highlighting or writing.
297.86

About this book

Vegetarians have argued at great length that meat-eating is wrong. Even so, the vast majority of people continue to eat meat, and even most vegetarians eventually give up on their diets. Does this prove these people must be morally corrupt?

In Why It's OK to Eat Meat, Dan C. Shahar argues the answer is no: it's entirely possible to be an ethical person while continuing to eat meat--and not just the "fancy" offerings from the farmers' market but also the regular meat we find at most supermarkets and restaurants. Shahar's examination forcefully echoes vegetarians' concerns about the meat industry's impacts on animals, workers, the environment, and public health. However, he shows that the most influential ethical arguments for avoiding meat on the basis of these considerations are ultimately unpersuasive. Instead of insisting we all become vegetarians, Shahar argues each of us has broad latitude to choose which of the world's problems to tackle, in what ways, and to what extents, and hence people can decline to take up this particular form of activism without doing anything wrong.

Key Features

    • First book-length defense of meat-eating written for a popular audience
    • Punchy, accessible introduction to the multifaceted debate over the ethics of eating meat
    • Includes pioneering new examinations of humane labeling practices
    • Shows why appeals to universalized patterns of behavior can't vindicate vegetarians' claims that there's a duty to avoid meat
    • Develops a novel theory of ethical activism with potential applications to a wide range of other issues