Home / Search / After the Demise of the Tradition: Rorty, Critical Theory, and the Fate of Philosophy
Cover of After the Demise of the Tradition: Rorty, Critical Theory, and the Fate of Philosophy
ISBN-13 · 9780367015831ISBN-10 · 0367015838Publisher · RoutledgeFormat · Hardcover, 288 pagesPublished · 2020Language · English

After the Demise of the Tradition: Rorty, Critical Theory, and the Fate of Philosophy

Rent this book

Free return shipping included
Total rental price$123.75

Please Note: Rental books are typically used and do not come with any unused access code cards.

Return by 2026-10-26. Prepaid return label included; extend at any point for the difference in price.

Buy from a seller

Bookface-OutletShips from CA
GoodTypical used book with minor wear and signs of use. May have some highlighting or writing.
291.70

About this book

This ambitious book addresses the "end-of-philosophy" debate and the challenge it presents to contemporary philosophy, both continental and analytic. It is a chain of argument as well as a conversation conducted in the presence of the major contributors to that debate: the critics (especially Richard Rorty) of the dominantly Platonic-Cartesian-Kantian tradition on the one hand and its defenders on the other. Nielsen's account draws on Wittgenstein, Quine, Davidson, Habermas, and Foucault, among others. Nielsen takes Rorty's arguments seriously and insists that they demand a rethinking of the role of philosophy in a world in which the claims of relativism, nihilism, and historicism loom increasingly larger. But, unlike most who are impressed with the end-of-philosophy argument, he provides an original and constructive response: the development of a holistic, antifoundationalist account of philosophy that utilizes a form of critical theory and wide reflective equilibrium in carving out a positive role for a new kind of philosophy. This is an important book not just for philosophers but tor social theorists, for literary critics, and indeed for scholars in any field in which the status of knowledge has become problematic.